Corporate favoritism

Ron Paul is against any and all corporate donations to his campaign. He has never, in the three times running for president, and his 40 years in congress accepted donations from corporations. On his website for donating, he accepts a maximum of $2500 per person. Ron Paul has never been bought by Wall Street, has never been propped up by him, and his support is 100% grassroots. Ron Paul is also against lobbyists (I believe), and will be cutting the chamber of Commerce when he becomes president. He is also against the idea that "Corporations are people". He is also completely against corporation bailouts. 


Pros: Ron Paul does not accept corporate donations, and is therefore free from strings that keep him tied to the corporations. Ron Paul also receives more donations from active military members than all other republican candidates (combined). He receives about 3/2 what Obama does. 


Cons: Less money for his campaign. 


My take: As a grassroots effort, Ron Paul literally represents his supporters. Obama accepted over $1M from Goldmann Sachs, and would have survived on his trails even without his support's money. Ron Paul is literally running his tour bus from my donations.


---


Audit the FED. Ron Paul predicted the housing bubble 7 years before it happened, and tells us the FED causes bubbles by printing more money than they should. A recent small time audit of the FED was conducted and showed that they loaned upwards of $16T to foreign countries, foreign banks, banks in America, and etc, without the approval of any government office. Our government didn't even know about it. These are the people in control of printing our money, and they do this. When you put more money into circulation, the money we already have is diluted and not worth as much. Thus, inflation occurs.